No Safeword – Mia Hope vs Kylie Moone

Protocol 77, colloquially known as the “Null-Safeword” trial, is designed to isolate and measure the psychological endurance of a specimen when stripped of the fundamental safety net of consent-based revocation. This experiment removes the subject’s power to halt the stimulus, transferring all control to the pre-selected, immutable time lock. The goal is to observe and catalog the raw, unfiltered progression of panic, submission, and catharsis when the conscious mind understands that pleading is futile. This paper details the methodology and observations from Subject Kylie’s third trial, her first with the newly appointed Co-Tickler, Mia Hope.

The Null-Safeword protocol exists in a deeply controversial space. Standard BDSM practice dictates that a safeword is an inviolable contract. We posit that a different caliber of psychological data emerges when that contract is intentionally and consensually dissolved before the scene begins. The subject’s agency is exercised entirely in the pre-experiment phase by self-selecting a hard time limit. The specimen is made fully aware: once the sheath is sealed and the clock starts, their voice is forfeit. The only acceptable termination is a medical emergency, defined by a specific physical signal.